Eficacia y seguridad de los glucocorticoides en la artritis reumatoide: revisión sistemática de la literatura / Efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis: systematic literature review

OBJETIVOS: 1) Revisar sistemática y críticamente la evidencia sobre las características de uso, eficacia y seguridad de los glucocorticoides (GC) en la artritis reumatoide (AR); 2) emitir recomendaciones prácticas sobre su utilización. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la literatura con una estrategia de búsqueda bibliográfica sensible en Medline, Embase y Cochrane Library. Se seleccionaron ensayos clínicos aleatorizados que analizasen la eficacia y/o la seguridad de los GC en pacientes con AR. Dos revisores realizaron la primera selección por título y abstract y 10, la selección tras lectura en detalle y la recogida de datos. La calidad se evaluó con la escala de Jadad. En una reunión de grupo nominal con base en sus resultados se consensuaron una serie de recomendaciones. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 47 artículos. Los GC, en combinación con los fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad, ayudan a controlar la actividad de la enfermedad y a inhibir la progresión radiográfica, especialmente en el corto-medio plazo y en las AR de inicio. Los GC pueden mejorar la función y el dolor. Distintos tipos y vías de administración son eficaces, sin que exista un esquema de tratamiento estandarizado (dosis de inicio, desescalada y duración del tratamiento con los GC) superior a otro. Los acontecimientos adversos de los GC son muy frecuentes, dependientes de la dosis, de gravedad variable, muchos de ellos leves. Se generaron 7 recomendaciones sobre el uso y la gestión del riesgo de los GC. CONCLUSIONES: Estas recomendaciones pretenden resolver algunos interrogantes clínicos habituales y facilitar la toma de decisiones con respecto al uso de GC en la AR

OBJECTIVES: 1) To systematically and critically review the evidence on the characteristics, efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids (CS) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); 2) to generate practical recommendations. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed through a sensitive bibliographic search strategy in Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library. We selected randomized clinical trials that analyzed the efficacy and/or safety of CS in patients with RA. Two reviewers performed the first selection by title and abstract. Then 10 reviewers selected the studies after a detailed review of the articles and data collection. The quality of the studies was evaluated with the Jadad scale. In a nominal group meeting, based on the results of the systematic literature review, related recommendations were reached by consensus. RESULTS: A total of 47 articles were finally included. CS in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs help control disease activity and inhibit radiographic progression, especially in the short-to-medium term and in early RA. CS can also improve function and relieve pain. Different types and routes of administration are effective, but there is no standardized scheme (initial dose, tapering and duration of treatment) that is superior to others. Adverse events when using CS are very frequent and are dose-dependent and variable severity, although most are mild. Seven recommendations were generated on the use and risk management of CS. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations aim to resolve some common clinical questions and aid in decision-making for CS use in RA

Efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis: Systematic literature review. / Eficacia y seguridad de los glucocorticoides en la artritis reumatoide: revisión sistemática de la literatura.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To systematically and critically review the evidence on the characteristics, efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids (CS) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); 2) to generate practical recommendations. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed through a sensitive bibliographic search strategy in Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library. We selected randomized clinical trials that analyzed the efficacy and/or safety of CS in patients with RA. Two reviewers performed the first selection by title and abstract. Then 10 reviewers selected the studies after a detailed review of the articles and data collection. The quality of the studies was evaluated with the Jadad scale. In a nominal group meeting, based on the results of the systematic literature review, related recommendations were reached by consensus. RESULTS: A total of 47 articles were finally included. CS in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs help control disease activity and inhibit radiographic progression, especially in the short-to-medium term and in early RA. CS can also improve function and relieve pain. Different types and routes of administration are effective, but there is no standardized scheme (initial dose, tapering and duration of treatment) that is superior to others. Adverse events when using CS are very frequent and are dose-dependent and variable severity, although most are mild. Seven recommendations were generated on the use and risk management of CS. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations aim to resolve some common clinical questions and aid in decision-making for CS use in RA.

Artritis reumatoide y miastenia gravis ocular: efectividad del rituximab en el manejo de ambas enfermedades / Rheumatoid arthritis and ocular myasthenia gravis: Effectiveness of rituximab in the management of these two diseases

No disponible

Calcinosis universalis en paciente con dermatomiositis / Calcinosis universalis in adult-onset dermatomyositis

No disponible

Artritis seronegativa secundaria a enfermedad de Mucha-Habermann / Seronegative arthritis secondary to Mucha-Habermann disease

No disponible

Calcinosis en manos y síndrome antisintetasa sin afectación muscular / Calcinosis in hands and antisynthetase syndrome without muscle involvement

No disponible

[Predictors of response to biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis]. / Factores predictores de respuesta a terapias biológicas en la artritis reumatoide.

The advent of biological therapies has revolutionized the management of rheumatoid arthritis, demonstrating effectiveness in controlling clinical and radiological damage. However, 20 to 40% of the patients will not respond to these therapies, which are associated to a very high cost. In addition, non-responder patients are exposed to possible adverse effects. For these reasons, we need to identify predictors of response to these treatments. These predictors are reviewed in this evidence-based paper and classified into genetic and non-genetic. Despite extensive search, nowadays there are no predictors powerful enough to be used in regular clinical practice. Serum factors, the presence of rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, are the only factors currently being used to predict the response to specific biological therapy. In the future, probably thanks to new technologies based on genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics, it will be possible to identify genetic predictors of response to biological drugs that will allow us to select suitable patients for a specific biological therapy.

Factores predictores de respuesta a terapias biológicas en la artritis reumatoide / Predictors of response to biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis

El desarrollo de las terapias biológicas ha supuesto un gran avance en el manejo de la artritis reumatoide (AR) al haber demostrado efectividad en el control de la clínica y daño radiológico. Sin embargo, entre un 20-40% de los pacientes no van a responder a estas terapias, lo que determina un alto coste económico a la vez que los expone a posibles efectos adversos, por lo que se precisa de la identificación de factores predictores de respuesta a ellos. Estos se revisan en el actual trabajo en función de su evidencia científica y se clasifican en genéticos y no genéticos. A pesar de su extensa búsqueda, en la actualidad no disponemos de potentes predictores que puedan ser utilizados en la práctica clínica diaria. Posiblemente a día de hoy sólo los factores séricos, positividad del factor reumatoide (FR) y anticuerpos antipéptido citrulinado (anti-CCP), permiten predecir la respuesta a determinados biológicos. En un futuro, probablemente gracias a las nuevas tecnologías basadas en la genómica, transcriptómica y proteómica se identificarán predictores genéticos que permita seleccionar pacientes idóneos para una determinada terapia biológica(AU)

The advent of biological therapies has revolutionized the management of rheumatoid arthritis, demonstrating effectiveness in controlling clinical and radiological damage. However, 20 to 40% of the patients will not respond to these therapies, which are associated to a very high cost. In addition, non-responder patients are exposed to possible adverse effects. For these reasons, we need to identify predictors of response to these treatments. These predictors are reviewed in this evidence-based paper and classified into genetic and non-genetic. Despite extensive search, nowadays there are no predictors powerful enough to be used in regular clinical practice. Serum factors, the presence of rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, are the only factors currently being used to predict the response to specific biological therapy. In the future, probably thanks to new technologies based on genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics, it will be possible to identify genetic predictors of response to biological drugs that will allow us to select suitable patients for a specific biological therapy(AU)

Daño auditivo como parte de las manifestaciones neurológicas en la enfermedad de Behçet / No disponible

No disponible

Influencia del bloqueo del factor de necrosis tumoral alfa (infliximab) en el metabolismo lipídico de pacientes con artritis reumatoide / Influence of tumor necrosis alpha blockade with infliximab on lipid profile in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis

No disponible

No disponible